Education

 

Students start at about age six and go to elementary school for six years.  Next, they attend lower secondary school (a.k.a., Junior High) for three years.  Both of these two are required.  The next stage, upper secondary school (a.k.a., High School) is for three years and is voluntary, but about 99% of all students go on to this stage anyway.  Next up is higher education, in which about 50% go on to the university level, which is similar to the U.S.

 

Education is highly centralized in Japan, meaning that nearly everything is controlled by the Ministry of Education (known as MEXT).  MEXT prescribes courses of study, textbooks, pays for books, and pay for ½ of compulsory teacher salaries (other ½ from local authorities).  A current debate exists, however, on whether if local areas should be given the money so that they may make these decisions.  MEXT also organizes training courses for teachers (10th Year Training Course), subsidizes construction of school buildings, and runs state universities (87).

 

The goals of MEXT are high: zero illiteracy, satisfactory international performance, 50% in higher education, 98% attendance in upper secondary schools, and 100% enrollment in lower and elementary schools. 

 

The Japanese are concerned over some issues in education, however.  In international surveys, while Japan scores high in knowledge level of subjects such as math and science, they rank very low in terms of those subjects being favorites or doing voluntary study time.  In short, they don’t seem to like what they’re doing; they score well, but don’t like doing it (i.e., in ’99, for math, Japanese students were 5th in total score of knowledge, but 36th, or last, in terms of liking it).  So this leads to questions over how well students will continue to perform.

 

Another issue, it seems that Japanese children have large amounts of knowledge but lack in the ability to learn and think by themselves and the ability to apply their knowledge.  Why?  Perhaps the excessive competition for entrance examinations to get to universities. 

 

Moreover, successive incidents of school violence and bullying are on the rise, meaning kindness to others, respect of life and human rights may not be sufficiently fostered in school. 

 

These problems may exist due to other reasons as well.  Excessive competition for examination, underdeveloped social side and moral sense, delayed development of independence, and problems concerning health and physical stamina. 

 

How to fix this?  By trying to educate “creative” individuals and providing more “diversity” and “flexibility” in their educational system.  In other words, giving children room to grow and a zest for living.  Simply put, Japanese children are far too busy.

 

As a result, the numbers of children refusing to attend school has been increasing (i.e., 3% of elementary students).  Some refusing to attend high schools, largely due to angst regarding high school entrance examinations (about 2%).  Bullying and violence in school was on the rise as well, especially in lower secondary schools.  However, these numbers decreased over the past few years, so that may be a good sign, but the numbers have increased recently, leading to more concerns. 

 

How to fix this?  Trying to nurture a zest for living.  That is, providing students the ability to identify problems for themselves, learn by themselves, think for themselves, make independent judgments and actions and solve problems properly.  Essentially, they want students to be able to do things on their own.  They also focus on the emotional and physical health of students and also provide more free time and strictly focus on the basic essentials (i.e., were essentially over teaching students in the past).  Other ideas include trying to implement a five-day school week and relax the excessive examination competition.  Also seen as very important is a focus on teaching compassion for others.  But also need to include parents into this equation and improve their involvement in their childrens’ lives outside of education.

 

Ultimately, this means breaking away from the “uniform education” idea in which uniformity is most important.  Instead, they want to focus on diversifying things for students and allowing teachers and local schools to take the initiative (things have been too rigid, so attempt deregulation of some institutions and give more freedom to local school boards) in implementing these ideas.  At this point, it seems that these ideas are beginning to work.  But time will ultimately tell.

 

 

Lecture Given By:

Tsutomu Kimura

President, National Institution for Academic Degrees

Vice Chairman, Central Council for Education

October, 2004